MOSCOW, 17 Dec – RIA Novosti. a great story with races in Moscow on the Gelandewagen failed Monday hell Gagarinsky court which acquitted all the episodes of the driver of the SUV Abduvahob madzhidova, and two other defendants, son of the Vice-President of “LUKOIL” Ruslan Shamsuarov Viktor Uskov, assigned 300 hours of compulsory work; this luxury SUV was confiscated to the state.
the Prosecutor demanded to sentence all three to 25 months of penal colony, told reporters he would appeal against the court’s decision. The defense has said it is satisfied with the justification for the episode with the threat of violence against the police.
Interviewed by RIA Novosti experts believe that the punishment of young people is too soft, but refer to the existing Russian realities. And human rights activist Lyudmila Alexeyeva called the court’s decision optimal: one of the fine would not be enough correctional force majeure “sweat”, but prison is too much.
Details of the race: the flying wand
In late may, the Internet appeared a video in which the young people at Mercedes-Benz G63 AMG violated the rules of the road, and then tried to hide from the police, crossing a solid stripe on sidewalks and lawns. For specified violations of traffic rules by young people in may was sentenced to 15 days of administrative arrest.
At the hearing in the criminal case on the circumstances of the race with the police, during which, according to the TFR, Shamsuarov, madzhidov and Uskov has violated the criminal article “the threat of violence against a representative of authorities” and “insult of representative of power”, on Monday was announced interesting details of a sensational race. So, the judge of the Gagarin court told how son, Vice-President of “LUKOIL” and his friends insulted police officers.
“the Phrase “sat on a stick” belongs Shamsuarov. According to the examination of the phrases “sat on a stick”, “who are you today let’s sit down” we can conclude that the traffic police should have intercourse with her wand,” said the judge, reading the insights of psycho-linguistic examination.
This is used in the address of traffic police of the phrase “have a negative aura” and “defaming the honor and reputation of the police,” identified expertise. Linguists came to the conclusion that the defendants were trying to “show the superiority” and to emphasize that the police are to them are “external foreign group”. The judge noted that the actions of the defendants appear abnormal behavior.
Shamsuarov during the interrogation, the court said that they could not influence the motion of the machine, as in the back seat, no steering wheel and pedals, and cursed the passengers, because they were “wild strain” during a chase on the Gelandewagen.
According to Shamsuarov, he drank from Uskov on the night of 22 may. “We left the club around 4.00, I sat in the back seat of his car. In the club I drank and Uskov, so she offered to drive Majidova,” said the defendant.
Then they went in the direction of Lenin Avenue, where they tried to stop the police. “DPS officer ran in our direction with a bus lane and threw us a stick (rod), hit the bumper and broke right through him… why would he do that I do not understand,” said Shamsuarov, noting that then “someone offered to go back and find out why the employee threw a rod.”
Stream the chase online, according to the defendant, was included with his phone.
Uskov, in turn, said that during the arrest police threatened him with a weapon.
“When I got back to the SUV (after the chase), the employee of traffic police Alexey called me, he came in the Mercedes E-class, was very aggressive, repeatedly applied to my neck the barrel of a gun,” said Uskov, noting that other police behaved correctly.
they Also found that Uskov summer was on probation for stealing cable. The defendant said that “cable is not stolen and dismantled, it was not working”.
madzhidov argued that to leave from a pursuit, they became frightened by the aggressive behaviour of the traffic policeman, rushing in them the rod, and indeed “it all happened spontaneously.” “To broadcast on the Internet, I found out only when we were detained. Insults were against other police, but not to those that persecuted us,” said Majidov, who was driving a Gelandewagen while on a chase.
Pressure and threats
during the trial, the lawyer Mikhail Dolomanov said that the case against Shamsuarov illegal, and investigator “under pressure”, including public statements of the head of the Moscow police Anatoly Yakunin, who is on TV claimed that “the pursuit lasted about five hours.”
“We ask the court to attach a video where the General media is talking about it. The Prosecutor denied this, saying that the chase lasted several minutes”, — said the lawyer Shamsuarov, and supported defender madzhidova.
During sentencing, the defendants were calm. Near Shamsuarov stood two lawyers, a guard and a companion. Have madzhidova were also two lawyers, a “support group” represented by his brother. Uskova defended by one lawyer. All persons involved in periodically talking with their lawyers and copied to the mobile messengers.
After the verdict, the Prosecutor informed the journalists about the intention to appeal the verdict Shamsuarov. In the video, according to the Prosecutor, depicted as Shamsuarov gave instructions behind the wheel of an SUV Majidova braking and to perform other maneuvers, and allowed himself derogatory to speak to the inspectors. The specified crime, said the prosecution, was quite a group of persons by prior agreement.
“the Defendants did not respond to the police request to stay during their prosecution of the defendants maneuvers movements threatened the health and lives of the inspectors, traffic police, expressed insults at them, reminding all in the Internet,” — said the Prosecutor, noting that the SUV had no license plates, and access chase videos posted online, had a wide range of people.
Security Shamsuarov, in turn, argued that the case of objective evidence is enough to confirm that there was no violence on the part of the defendants.
“during the inspection of the car Gelandewagen belonging Shamsuarov was not found the device that allows to brake and otherwise control the car from the back seat. The prosecution is trying to “attract” our client to the actions of the other defendants in the case. The indictment also indicated what particular statements belong to whom. Protection comes to the conclusion about the absence of evidence of guilt Shamsuarov”, — said earlier in court, the lawyer accused Alexey Kolesnikov.
Let her sweat a little
According to Deputy Chairman of the Commission of Public chamber of the Russian Federation for security and interaction with the PMC Dmitry Chugunov assigned young people the punishment is too soft, but the other was hardly worth the wait.
“we Have, unfortunately, no law enforcement practice in this format. We have up to a certain period, until the last events of this story would have gone down “on the brakes”. And I understand part of the outrage of society and understand, including, and judges make such decisions… That to deprive him of the right for life would be a more logical solution to this problem, but such a rule we have,” — he said RIA Novosti.
the Social worker said that this situation is a good push for the expert community, which could reflect on a progressive scale of violations.
“so far, 300 hours for me personally, I think this is a weak punishment, but from existing at all in the Russian realities is the maximum that could be squeezed out,” added the member of the OP.
member of the presidential Council on human rights (HRC) Kirill Kabanov believes that stiffer penalties would be an effective tool in the fight against lawlessness on the roads.
“At the moment the process was to show, in principle, the rightness of the law and the absence of impunity. If 300 hours of work will turn into a farce, it will give rise to a new round of chaos that is happening on the roads, this permissiveness,” he told RIA Novosti Boars.
He noted that he does not see that “these thugs on roads became less.” “I still think that if it was real time, as it was stated in the beginning, then, of course, a harsh punishment in such cases is a deterrent. But these are all extra work, withdrawal of charges about threats of physical violence against a police officer, I think it’s a bad signal for the whole system,” — said the expert.
a Different point of view adheres to the head of the Moscow Helsinki group Lyudmila Alekseeva.
“I think that you have a correct in the sentence, because if it (Shamsuarov — ed) to award to a large fine, it is like the elephant a pellet, for it my dad will pay for and he was innocent, and left. But forced labor, let them sweat, let them work – Yes, we should. But not in jail,” said human rights activist RIA Novosti.
No comments:
Post a Comment