Photo: RIA Novosti
For the “law of the Rothenberg” (about payments to individuals and companies whose property was expropriated by foreign vessels) in the first reading voted 233 deputies, against – 202, two abstained. Every effort was made to ensure that United Russia Vladimir Ponevezhskogo bill was passed as quickly as possible, stated the deputy from the Liberal Democratic Party Alex Didenko, bearing in mind including the transfer of the draft on October 8 at a later time than planned.
transience of the draft constitutional committee chairman of United Russia, Vladimir Pligin explained the need to protect the rights of the Crimean people. “Today there is an objective threat ordered by the courts politically motivated decisions in relation to citizens of the Russian Federation, in particular, living in the Crimea, or having property in the area,” – he said, speaking with a report on this project. Recently adopted by the Ukrainian laws establishing jurisdiction of disputes arising in the Crimea, indicate the existence of the current “objective threat issuance Ukrainian courts politically motivated decisions about the Russians,” said author Ponevezhsky.
«And then Ukraine ? “- countered Communist Nikolai Kolomeytsev. “You’re 23 years old educated entrepreneurs that they should apply to London, Paris, Stockholm courts, and there they are treated. Under this law, it turns out that in principle we can overrule any decision. Why we sent them there? “- He was indignant. Protection Crimeans could separately in the law, at least limit the level of compensation, also noticed Eser Mikhail Emelyanov. But it is absolutely unacceptable that the law protects against the loss of the Russians, who have made an investment in Western Europe and the United States, because “these gentlemen simply made a mistake and misjudged the political risks».
«Why do we have to solve some private problems at the expense of our citizens? “- appealed to supporters of the initiative Alex Didenko. “Citizens are willing to rough it (price increase due to sanctions). Why they do not provide any mechanism? “- Continued the deputy. It is clear, he says, that the law will affect primarily the Russians caught in sanctions lists.
The widespread opinion that the bill is aimed solely at protecting the narrow circle of persons, owns a considerable fortune, does not correspond to today’s realities, said Pligin. In addition, he emphasized, the opposition of big business owners and the community is counterproductive. Due to the illegal decisions of foreign courts can not be lost yachts and villas, and “specific assets that work, including on our state, and cultural values,” said the deputy chairman of the Constitutional Committee of United Russia Dmitry Vyatkin.
Little addition, the Russians caught in sanctions lists, and so there is nothing abroad, said Pligin. “I would not like to see at least somebody got the impression that these people are supposed to put on the sanctions list, something has. This is an absolute lie. Most people who are in these sanctions lists, never had anything abroad, and they are in no way abroad are not related, except that they carry out their public duties, “- said the deputy.
Duma opposition insisted that the budget has no money for the compensation provided scandalous project. “Today, the media are full of the fact that here the attraction generosity. People who have repeatedly taken [capital] of the Russian Federation, we have them again [give money] from the budget “, – said Kolomeytsev. Money in the budget is not even on the refugees from Donetsk and Lugansk added Eser Oleg Nilov.
Supporters resonance initiative called perturbed deputies read carefully the text of the bill and not “distort”. Vyatkin proposed the MPs who have comments to the text sent to the Committee the amendments for the second reading, “and not to rub stamps and inflate fears for public consumption and the media».
The representative of the Finance Ministry told RBC that the bill did the Office for the assessment only in the early stages of training – evaluation of the latest edition of the Ministry of Finance did not. “Large fiscal risks do not see because of the lack of precedents. If the project will become a federal law – we will implement it, “- said the representative office.
A government source said that the bill did not meet the open opposition to the government, primarily because of its senselessness and inoperable. “Around him more negative noise than the real expectations of some effect. The bill does not guarantee compensation for the violation of the law of another country. Does not guarantee it, and compensation for damages. Rather it is seen as the norm of apology. Same argument for any compensation payments from the budget can only be a decision of the Russian court. ”
No comments:
Post a Comment