The situation around the prosecution Vladimir Yevtushenko discussed with the editor in chief Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Roman Badanin RBC and RBC special correspondent Svetlana Reuters.
– What a “case Vladimir Yevtushenko” This new “Yukos affair»?
– For me there is no question. Naturally, I can not give any proof, but my opinion is that Izmest’ev (ex-senator from Bashkiria Igor Izmest’ev serving a life sentence and, according to investigators associated with the former leadership of Bashkortostan – RBC), which is in very pinched circumstances received an offer he could not refuse. The proposal was due to the fact that Igor Sechin (President state company “Rosneft” – RBC), in my opinion, naupravlyalsya “Rosneft” to the point that there is beginning to fall prey (for eight months in 2014, “Rosneft”, according to CDU TEK , reduced production by 0.3% to 127.2 million tonnes. – RBC) and solve the problem of production has fallen down, he can not by technological methods. Investors are indifferent to him, it is important that it is not noticed by one person – it is clear who. Since our president is not very well versed in these matters, the addition of “Bashneft” to “Rosneft” can hide the failure by the parent company.
I think that is what Igor Ivanovich now and care. And with the money he is now just .opa. By the way, about the finances Sechin … (laughs) … I’m very pleased that we now have pension money will be used to compensate for the 50 million salary Igor Ivanovich (according to the press, “Rosneft” previously applied for the support of 1.5 trillion rubles at the expense of the National Welfare Fund, expert evaluation of the annual remuneration Sechin gave $ 50 million in 2013, the Russian magazine Forbes, later the court at the suit of Sechin recognized these facts discrediting – RBC). And since the money .opa, then enroll in the ordinary course of Putin’s policies – that is, more or less well to settle with the owner – Sechin could not afford. Therefore, by tradition, he repeats the model, which was successfully used in the “Yukos affair”. The difference, however, is that the Yukos affair came from Putin’s team, and it began with our discussions with Putin on corruption in Russia. And here it is a purely commercial situation – he (Sechin – RBC) is necessary to tear this piece and tear it for free. Therefore, he makes.
– In other words, you admit that Putin did not know about the attack on Evtushenkova?
– It is not know it, of course could not, but the good he could get in a state where Putin is not particularly think about what is happening …
– Why? This is due to the sanctions and paramilitary regime in which the country lives?
– When Vladimir Vladimirovich built vertical of power, he said a hundred times that for a country such rigid vertical administratively inefficient. But as long as he is able to address questions to a simple transfer of money to the budget, everything was fine. But when the situation with money has become a little worse, Putin has to solve too many problems at once. And this is too much for one person. A system, I repeat, it is closed and so one until he says, the problem is solved or not at all, or solve those whom no one is empowered and who certainly have a selfish motivation.
– You accidentally said the word “free pick up” in relation to “Bashneft”? Or do you, with Yevtushenkov still negotiating the price?
– You can not say any more conducted negotiations with him. For example, some of my colleagues prior to 2006 have been assured that they are in talks, but I understand that there are no negotiations with them. During this confusion one man lost his life – Vasily Aleksanyan. He believed that he could have something to negotiate with them, but when they found that it is an obstacle to the process, it just took and shut down, and he took it and died eventually.
As in the case of Yukos and now I sees one word … – “barbarians.” Destroy completely unique technological complex for the country. What, then, is now. Or at least put it under a severe blow on the stock exchange and they are now falling considerably (ADR MTS in New York) fell by 4.57%). For what ?! In order to rub in glasses Putin? Because of their own inability to deal with oil production? …
But it was unclear that the linguist can not (education Sechin – scholar-novelist – RBC)?
– How would you advise Yevtushenkov behave now?
– I am well acquainted with Vladimir, we had finished one faculty at the same university. He is older than me for fifteen years, I did it at the factory was working when he was head of the workshop. I can say that I have to Yevtushenkov always treated well. He is not the man who blows into the breach, but for those conditions in which it has to exist, it is, in my opinion, is always sufficiently well behaved.
Of course, to him people have different attitudes, but First the man is already 66 years old, and secondly, he’s actually the blood of Christian children did not drink …
If you have the opportunity to go Evtushenkova an agreement – to go for it. If it is possible to appeal to Putin – refer to Putin. Of course, it is better to negotiate with Putin since at least he is not cheating, and these cheat.
I would not have seen this no shame and discomfort, if he agreed to all conditions. When I shut down, I was 40 and then still I had internal ideology (it still is), for the sake of it can be had. When you’re 66 and in order to not take away property? .. It will be much harder and nastier.
– to leave the country would be a shame?
No, it’s not a shame.
– About the influence of the case against Evtushenkova on the investment climate in the country worth talking about?
– And this is where the investment climate has to fall? .. It should have been during this difficult time for the country to put more and this blow to a technology company? I do not understand.
– A representative of the Investigative Committee spokesman Vladimir Markin may understand. He says that the arrest Evtushenkova shows that “for our system untouchables not.”
– As they say on the Internet, Markin, kill yourself on the wall! For a country it would only be useful.
– What, in your opinion, over the attack on the “System”?
-Hope, in the best case, it will end with something like “Gusinsky case” (the summer of 2000 the owner, Vladimir Gusinsky’s NTV was taken into custody on charges of fraud, three days a preventive measure Gusinsky was relaxed and was able to travel abroad, while Gusinsky’s media assets were sold associated with the state media holding “Gazprom-Media” – RBC).
September 17, 2014
RBC
No comments:
Post a Comment