Thursday, January 21, 2016

The Litvinenko case: what happened to the key witnesses – BBC News

The Litvinenko case in Britain are investigating nearly 10 years, taking on the brakes, then advancing to three times the speed depending on the political situation. And every time it ends with loud anti-Russian statements, even if these statements are not supported by a single fact. Meanwhile, the facts in the case, but they are, to put it mildly, not very pleasing to the British secret service. So do not fit into the promulgated January 21, 2016 report. Andrei Kondrashov personally met with many persons involved in the Litvinenko case and knows why the deceased former employee of the special services needed it today.

hackneyed Litvinenko case according to the laws of the genre has its strictly assigned to the 9 years of the visual image. Maximum compassion for a person who has even the hair fell from the radiation, and the suspicion of the Russian special services. Who else is capable of such sophisticated murder? And nobody seemed to know that Litvinenko shaved Ukrainian woman – a housekeeper Akhmed Zakayev – at the request of Berezovsky. Then Boris Abramovich will call the photographer will select a good frame and distribute press. Just think: for 9 years, the picture of Alexander Litvinenko in his hospital bed was published around the world 8,000 times. And today’s newspaper, of course, will add to him the circulation is still a couple of hundred.

Interestingly, London, in recent years using the Litvinenko affair as a bogey, which is stored in a frozen state in the case when there is a need to draw a Russian monster. Last time this bogey from the refrigerator gently during the last aggravation of Russian-British relations – when he was shot down over the Malaysian Boeing Donbas. Wines Russia with Boeing is not proven as poisoning Litvinenko Russian secret services, but the right pellet the public should remain.

“In July 2014 it became clear that the investigation into the death of Alexander Litvinenko finally moved from the criminal law into the political plane. The judge said that private meetings are now allow him to, and I quote, “as much as possible to consider the responsibility of Russia” on the materials submitted by the British secret services. Thus, the offender was assigned initially, and under it is only just needed to adjust some so-called classified “facts” – says Acting Head of Department for investigation of particularly important cases of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation Igor Krasnov. – Casuistry British justice is at the very notion of “public inquiry”. What is called “public” – actually means publication of classified material, but note closed. A publicly disclosed a conclusion on the basis of closed meetings. In other words, we’re seeing some secret data, discussed and came to the conclusion that the blame Lugovoi, Kovtun and possibly Russian state. What’s the secret evidence – we can not say it’s a secret. And from the culprits including “.

” But in general, of course, it is strange that the British justice at all in the terminology generally uses the phrase as “possible” and “probable”. Or perhaps “impossible” and “unbelievable.” As to the investigation have the fundamental point of view, I must say that there is no public inquiry was not. It is in fact this is not covered with a lie, it is a misconception that brings the entire international community, and in general any person who watches television or reads newspapers “- assesses the British investigation into Litvinenko State Duma Deputy Andrei Lugovoi.

Andrei Lugovoi, Dmitry Kovtun and the Investigative Committee of Russia were recognized as an interested party in London, to participate in the investigation refused. And apparently, they are not useful. That is, to paraphrase Robert Owen: “We have not seen evidence of Russia innocence in the murder of Litvinenko. And what is the presumption of innocence, we do not know “.

It is interesting that when the decision to start so-called” public inquiry “in the Litvinenko case it was impossible to hear the key witnesses. The first – Boris Berezovsky, the motives which make of Litvinenko sacred political victim, says a lot. The death of Berezovsky – is still a big mystery. The second witness – Lord David West, the owner of the club Abracadabra on Jermain Street in London.

We met him while filming film “Berezovsky” in autumn 2012. Then the eccentric Lord told his club closed the intelligence services of Britain, finding in it the traces of polonium. Scotland Yard was in the wake of Litvinenko by printing his phone calls and credit card transactions.

“Yes, he really came here quite regularly. We were very, very lucky because on his visit to our restaurant learned only four months later by a transaction with his credit card. Otherwise, we would be closed for several months. Came to us with a check, they checked the whole area, a staircase, a place where Litvinenko was sitting. But traces of polonium were already very weak, “- said Lord David West.

Indications Lord West police recorded, but here’s the problem: cash credit card transactions Litvinenko had a date, according to which Litvinenko left footprints polonium Club (attention! ) two days before the meeting with Lugovoi at the Millennium.

“Certificate Lord West in tatters was breaking the current version of the poisoning of Litvinenko at the Millennium Hotel Lugovoi and Kovtun,” – said the journalist and television producer Alexander box.

That is, it turns out that it’s not Lugovoy brought polonium from Moscow, and before his arrival Litvinenko already being left around London radioactive traces. This fact classified. But when to reopen the investigation in the summer of 2014, Lord West was going to check transactions Litvinenko go to court to say. But the December 12, 2014, Lord West was killed by a single blow of a knife in the heart. The murder accused’s son. And it is TV producer Alexander boxes that personally knew the Lord, hard to believe.

“The fact that there was no evidence that he and his son had a bad relationship. And in general, in conversations with people that it is also close enough to know they were all deeply shocked. I think that this murder mystery will put historians on a par with the same mysterious murders, as the death of Dr. Kelly, “- said the journalist and television producer Alexander Korobko.

Dr Kelly – an expert on the Iraqi dossier, which is publicly subjected him to questioning and refused to justify the invasion of Iraq. The doctor was found in the woods with a rip veins.

And here is a strange sacrifice – Alexander Perepelichny mysteriously died after a morning run in London. His body kind of found the poison Chinese plants. But then, too, all secretive, and now the investigation will also resume.

“Perepelichny, according to our information, has been associated, say, with a major fraud gangs, which operates at a high level, which included William Browder. And Perepelichny doing, frankly, conversion of funds abroad “, – the expert says,” Federal Information Center “Ruslan Milchenko.

Alexander Perepelichny – an agent of the British MI6, – helped fraudster William Browder compile a list of Magnitsky. This He was very devoted to all schemes withdraw money from Russia. It surprises with the guilty in his strange death of us, apparently, are still waiting for.

But back to Litvinenko. Now who will conclude his doctor, which he held in the hands of the father of Litvinenko – Walter. There was not a word about the poisoning by polonium. Walter Litvinenko at the hearing was not invited, nor responded to the documents Sergey Sokolov. And he – evidence that polonium Litvinenko got himself on the old landfill on the island of Barsa-Kelmes in Aral Sea. And to help him, ostensibly, Western intelligence agencies.

“They hired a guide, because they did not know how to get to the island. Conductor and now live. We interviewed him on video. All there is evidence of all. And we sent it to England. And we can call, moreover, surnames CIA and MI6, who participated in the operation. Surnames, “- emphasizes the founder of the security service Berezovsky Sergei Sokolov.

Britain, these documents are not useful. Yet the intricacies of the English courts in fact can be very primitive and fit just milestones in relations between Russia and the West. 2003 – the special position of Russia on Iraq, Britain gives asylum to Akhmed Zakayev and Boris Berezovsky.

In 2014, Russia is reunited with Crimea – starts a new process in the Litvinenko case.

The end of 2015, the first and the beginning of 2016 – Russia is leading the fight against global terrorism, and even the rest of calls to join the coalition. We obtain the withdrawal of British justice: Russia on an example of Litvinenko killing unwanted on foreign soil. Now, if the anti-terrorist coalition is created, the reluctance of anyone to join under the auspices of the Russian advance should be somewhat justified. And it is unlikely in this case someone in the West seriously concerned about the true causes of Litvinenko’s death.

More information about . Watch the video

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment