an International investigation led by the Netherlands published the preliminary results of the investigation of the crash Malaysian “Boeing” in the Donbass. The results are: the aircraft allegedly shot down from territory controlled by militias from anti-aircraft missile complex, which was brought from Russia. However, both journalists and experts immediately drew attention to a strange detail: the facts that the investigators somehow ignored, much more than the facts that they took into account. That is, conclusions were made initially and then reinforced by sketchy data.
Wrong answer, the wrong location of the launch — the report of the international panel of experts-engineers have discovered dozens of inconsistencies. Western investigators over two years customized insights with the version that the rocket allegedly flew from the village of Snow. This version is beneficial to the West, and Ukraine — there were militia. The statement of the investigators denied instantly. Data on primary radar (he captures everything down to the smallest objects at a distance of 360 kilometers) missiles.
According to zamglavnogo the designer of Lianozovsky Electromechanical plant Victor Mescheryakov, to see at least one label – the probability is almost 100 percent. “Thus, if the locator did not see this rocket from the Snow, it was not really. The missile was launched from a different direction,” he said.
In the technical details of international investigators even didn’t say about. Barely started reading the report blamed Russia. Is Western viewer will continue in the argument to understand?
“it Can be concluded that flight MH17 was shot down on 17 July 2014 a series 9M38 missile fired by Buk missile. This setting was taken from the territory of the Russian Federation. After the launch of “Buk” was returned to Russia”, — said the head of the investigation Department of the police in the Netherlands Gilbert Paulissen.
“an Investigation of who is responsible, takes even more time. It’s a long process”, — said the head of the joint investigation team to investigate the crash of a Malaysian “Boeing” in the Donetsk region Fred Westerbeke.
How much time will search for and relatives and journalists admitted honestly don’t know.
to make it clear that two years anything was doing the route that “Buk” allegedly imported from Russia, painted in a computer program. These are usually used for drawing cartoons. This is evidenced by the corresponding note in the lower left corner — animation. Of arguments, images and videos from social networks. Including the ones that are experts denied two years ago. That their findings, the investigators analyzed not all the wreckage, but only those that fit the main version, not said a word.
As the Advisor to the chief designer of Concern ASD “Almaz-Antey” Mikhail Malyshev, the Internet, and not only that there are many other pieces which somehow did not get to the final calculation. They are contrary to the technical report of the Dutch Committee, said Malyshev.
Here is an example. Recall that the rocket “Beech” does not cut into the plane and explodes near the target. The shards scatter to the sides. If the missile was fired from Pervomayskaya or zaroshchens’ke, “Boeing” it would be approaching on a collision course. That is, the flies would either the right or the left, and flew forward, in this case, the aircraft most would be struck by the left side of the cab . The left wing and the left engine would be practically not affected. But in the photo she literally riddled. Damage is on the wing.
Instead of carrying out technical analysis, international investigators found some audio recordings that have decided to give the negotiations militias.
- I don’t know Sanych, even as mine now will last, because now will begin to “Hail” dub, and I left all without razvedrota, it is generally p***y will be.
“Hail”-then okay, now the “drying” will strike in the morning if I have time in the morning to “book” and send back, it will be good. If it doesn’t succeed, then f**.
what makes the authors think that it is the militia? Where are they talking? When? Date nobody confirms. As soon as it comes on technically accurate data, international investigators generally try to avoid details. For example, conducted the experiment, ostensibly to find out the type of missiles. Installed some metal sheets around something, an explosion. Looks impressive, but the journalists didn’t even show that it blew up. Not shown, which holes left submunitions, not compared them to the holes of the “Boeing”.
“Despite the fact that we have betrayed the Dutch side the actual characteristics were removed the secrecy from the actual documents, invited them to read them with primary sources — documents of the late 70-80′s. However, experts TNO came to the conclusion that for physical reasons, the option of “Almaz-Antey” they are not perfect. After testing and a large number of simulations, we confirmed his version. Namely, that the advent of missiles and the arrangements for its meetings in accordance with the angle of 72 degrees in the horizontal plane, thus, confirmed his version of the likely missile launch from the area South of the village zaroshchens’ke,” — said Malyshev.
the Data of the Russian side for investigators, apparently, was like a bone in the throat.
the lead investigator Fred Westerbeke and the chief of the investigation Department of the police in the Netherlands Gilbert Paulissen at some point, even confused, they saw the Russian data. First one said: “Russia has also transferred the primary radar data. Even the Russian Federation recognized that the air was not a second plane.”
half an hour, and they pretend that they saw nothing. “That hasn’t yet been transferred to the investigative team, and we could not explore”.
could Not or would not another question. The Russian side has completely denied the version that the West was trying to promote in any way from the beginning. Missiles that Western investigators saw in social networks on the primary radar, no.
“If the Malaysian “Boeing” was hit by a missile fired from any district located on the East point of the disaster, it would have been detected by primary radar,” said the chief of the Radiotechnical troops VKS RF, major-General Andrew Coban.
“As a member of the investigation team, Ukraine openly evading the provision of data and manipulating the course of the investigation, which is on the wrong track from contradictory data about the striking elements to the definition of the type of missile, and, as a consequence, the place of its launch, which clearly refuted the information of the primary radar,” — said the head of the press service and information of the Ministry of defense of Russia Igor Konashenkov.
Instead of the data, who is responsible for the deaths of 298 innocent international investigators drew the shade of a hundred people. That’s how much allegedly was behind the destruction. When you call someone, even to predict not taken.
No comments:
Post a Comment