on Thursday, the Russian Investigative Committee reported on the arrest in Moscow airport owner” Domodedovo “Dmitry Mason who was charged in the terrorist attack in 2011.
Basmanny court in Moscow on Friday, considering the election of a bricklayer preventive measure.
according to the ministry representative Vladimir Markin, Mason is charged with article “execution of works or services that do not meet safety requirements, resulting in the death of two or more persons”.
The victims in the case of the explosion in “Domodedovo” preparing a multimillion-dollar suits and, according to the lawyer Igor Trunov, consider a criminal case against the airport management “restoration of justice”.
The company, which manages Moscow’s Domodedovo airport, called unjustified detention Mason.
it is absolutely clear that all of this could eventually lead to the nationalization of airport
During the interrogation, how to write a newspaper “Kommersant”, Dmitry Mason explained the investigator why he did not try to escape abroad. According to the newspaper, the owner of the airport said that he was in Russia as “the truth is on his side”.
The Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs of the detention Mason said that law enforcement agencies should use less severe measures suppression of suspects business.
The detention Mason happened a day after President Vladimir Putin announced the creation of a working group on law enforcement monitoring in the field of business, which should be engaged in the settlement of disputes between business and security forces.
BBC Russian service asked the experts, that means the detention of Domodedovo airport owner for the Russian business and what is now the airport.
Konstantin Simonov, general director national energy security Fund:
There is nothing good in terms of business perceptions on this matter will not, because this is another another scandal
The security forces, of course, may long to talk about. that there are reasonable grounds [to arrest Mason] and so on, but still feeling will be created, it is a criminal case is part of the struggle for ownership in the industry, this feeling will not leave us. Especially in the context of what is changing equity Vnukovo, Sheremetyevo airport: to come to private investors, and everyone knows who he is
The fact that the case five years ago to a new level, arrested the owner – everything. this, of course, will cause some suspicion that the use of security forces to address property issues going on.
and if we remember that in my last letter, President Putin said directly that this is unacceptable, and recognize that we have on neekonomicheeskim articles arrested entrepreneurs in order to tackle the issue of ownership, then the question arises as power structures are going to respond to what the president says.
And in a situation where we hear that we need to look for a new source of economic growth, to seek ways out of this situation, which came to a standstill when it is said about the growth of the business initiative, of course, the questions arise: if you are going to do business initiative based on economic growth (what we hear all the time from the government), then you will be this kind of things [as the arrest of Dmitry Mason] to clarify and explain
?
The case is really quite shocking, and it complements a series of high-profile cases – such as the story of “Bashneft”. There are, however, Evtushenkova not jailed, but nevertheless, he had long been under house arrest, and the asset “Bashneft” lost.
I’m not ready to assess what really lay behind actions of the investigating authorities, but that society will feel that it is part of the struggle for the property – it is inevitable. It intensifies when you remember the story of the consolidation of the three airports in a single set and remember who the shareholders of the same Sheremetyeva.
When creating a commission [to resolve the dispute between the business and the security forces], said that special cases not will be the subject of consideration. But I am convinced that these cases [as arrest Mason] can not pass such a discussion format.
I personally as a regular consumer of services of Russian airports seems that not solve the problem trying to find a bomb under prosvetke
Because it’s not just a special case, it is a question about the format of relations between business and power structures. And I am sure that in the end everything will turn to the consideration of personal files most iconic figures.
So, of course, it’s Mason at the first meeting of the commission will be discussed. Because this is not just a special, one-time event, it is a common situation, very bright, a scandalous story that shows the overall trend. If you dismiss from her, it means that such a commission does not make sense to create
The fact that [at Mason] had the opportunity [to leave the country.] – Obviously. And then – he is the owner of the airport. The airport owner a clear idea as to fly out of the country than that of the ordinary citizen of the country. But it must be understood that the departure abroad would mean that Mason will most likely be lost Airport.
I’m not saying that he necessarily save it now. Different evolved this kind of thing. We can recall the Yukos case and the case of “Bashneft”.
What would then Mason may say that he felt threatened, the departure would mean an admission of guilt, at least, the security forces in the eyes.
Now Mason, remained in the country, thereby showed that he is ready to fight for this asset in the future. This is not the first attack on Domodedovo. While previous attacks he beat. The right decision [to stay in Russia] or not – will show the further course of investigations
It is absolutely clear that all of this could eventually lead to the nationalization of the airport.. By analogy with the “Bashneft” – nationalized and then sold
I personally like a Russian airport services regular consumers think that not solve the problem trying to find a bomb under prosvetke.. Because our airport security can be said to benefit many western airports, where there are so many frameworks, prosvetok.
Does this mean that they are safer? No, I think if a terrorist act is being prepared, no frame will not help
Dmitry Potapenko, Managing Partner at Management Development Group:.
This was an expected event. It is not clear why he was not arrested earlier and not pressed the airport early. He knew that potentially has a chance of arrest, but, in fact, where did you run away? To leave another character in London?
From the point of view of preservation of their lives, the lives of their employees and their families, yes, of course, he has [had to leave the country]. Because the truth is he here still can not find a business he still will overcome.
Actually, where did you run away? To leave another character in London?
It will be quiet enough. His release, and then we will know that a certain “Baikal Finance Group” with registered capital of 10 thousand rubles, registered only yesterday, became the owner of a majority stake in Domodedovo.
He was given this opportunity, and he knew about this opportunities to leave the country. But especially and I have nowhere to go. This is the main problem. Russians sadness that there is no place to leave the country, you will be migrant workers elsewhere.
The ball something small. Unfortunately, the person who is engaged in business, become an ordinary janitor or open little shops and restaurant on the shores of Albion – is an escape from himself. And most importantly, that (…) you realize that you are not to blame, and you squeeze “on concepts.” By bandit concepts, not according to the law.
the arrest is a man who can in no way affect the actions of terrorists, because setting a framework does not lead to the safety of citizens, and to the deterioration of the security of citizens.
Let us remember the attack itself and the crowd of people in the area where the attack was carried out. Now compare the two photos -. A crowd of people in a terrorist attack zone and the crowds in front of a metal detector
and look at the amount of glazing, metal structures (which will damage and kill people elements in the implementation of a terrorist attack), first in the area, where the real attack was made, and then in the area where now passes inspection.
The damage at the time of gathering of people [before the metal detector] will be much greater. Therefore, a metal detector is not installed at the entrance to airports in other countries. There is an airport in the same open-visit place as a store or restaurant. And security abroad longer.
It’s about the redistribution of property in the future and on a mandatory basis. For us it is usually veiled by some mythological state, but because the state – a group of certain individuals, I think it will be redistributed in favor of the holders of the remaining two airports -. Vnukovo and Sheremetyevo
The airport first just change the owner conditional on certain ” . Baikal Finance Group “and then deteriorate the quality of service as in all the other airports
The President [Putin] said ( in the message to the Federal Assembly in December 2015 – ed. ) of thousands of criminal cases that have been initiated, and usually only 15% of them – it matters “for the cause”, and 180 thousand of cases – it is about the redistribution of property case
.
No comments:
Post a Comment