To do this, there were three official reasons, and one unofficial
Today, at 17:15, views: 6661
The State Duma passed in three readings the law on the extension of free privatization of housing up to March 1, 2017. There is no guarantee that a year later hour “X” will not be moved, nor the government, not the deputies can not give.
photo: Natalia Muschinkin
When more than 10 years ago taken the Housing Code, the law on the procedure for its introduction prescribed effect that the 1991 law” on privatization … “, giving the right to free privatization of housing a single, will cease to exist in 2007. Since hour “X” receded 4 times. Last time the devil had promised to bring the March 1, 2016. But again, did not disappoint …
The deputy head of the Ministry of Construction Natalia Antipina MP said that this is due to several reasons
First of all -. A significant portion of the citizens living in emergency shelter and awaiting resettlement, and if free privatization close, they will never be able to exercise their right, which have already benefited from other Russians
Second -. will not be able to issue free of charge to the ownership of an apartment, and those who stand in line for improvement of living conditions, and receive social housing after March 1, 2016
and finally, the Crimea:. there “have a problem with hostels” and “hard is the process of adaptation to the Russian legislation”
one more, the main reason. she did not name: the upcoming parliamentary elections, in which the list of “United Russia” must lead its leader, the head of Dmitry government Medvedev …
the head of the Duma Committee on Housing Galina Khovanskaya ( “CP”) recalled that, in fact except for the bill, which is February 18, last Thursday (!!!) made by the government and which eventually was adopted, there is exactly the same, made by deputies spravorossov back in December 2015. In any case, said Ms. Khovanskaya, it is necessary to accept a document in three readings, to February 26, it was able to endorse the Council of the Federation, and to “not be out of the legal field in the middle of March, and not put in a very awkward position of citizens.”
the question of why adopted precisely the government, later, and does not coincide with it word for word, the one that made spravorossy, or any other of the seven bills on the subject at different times MPs made to the State Duma of the different fractions, Ms. Antipina left without an answer.
Do not give it an answer to the question of Dmitry Savelyev (LDPR), asked, “Are you certain that all the problems in the Crimea will be solved in a year.”
Many MPs strongly doubted that the year will be able to give all the apartments, are now living in an emergency shelter. The corresponding state program pursuant to one of the May presidential decrees suggests to January 1, 2017 to solve the problem for those whose accommodation was found in an emergency as of 1 January 2012. Vladimir Sysoev (LDPR), gave the example of a seemingly very prosperous region – Khanty-Mansiysk District: according to him, the executive branch in Nefteyugansk and Ugra said that the dilapidated housing questions will decide no earlier than 2020. “Why are we tormenting citizens every year prolonging free privatization? Why not make it a perpetual, so they quietly took a decision and were on equal terms? “- Asked MP
« Solve the year of demolition of dilapidated housing problem can not be “, -. Confirmed Ms. Khovanskaya. And Ms. Antipina only said that “the debate is not finished, and there instructed Prime Minister to hold until October 1 consultation with the Economic Development Ministry and the deputies, and to decide on further terms depending on the implementation of current tasks»
. By the way, recently at the government hour in the State Duma, the auditor of the Accounting Chamber Yuri Roslyak said that three and a half years of implementation of the resettlement program of emergency shelter is made less than that required to do for the remainder to its end the year …
The Communists (Nicholas Kolomeytsev and Vladimir Fedotkin) recalled that the obligation has not been canceled, which assumed power in the early ’90s: to renovate dilapidated housing, transferred to the ownership of citizens. Ms. Antipina stated that “these issues relate to the subjects of the Russian Federation, municipalities and homeowners,” removing the responsibility from the federal government. And Ms. Khovanskaya said it ylethyl about the state of default, and if citizens are going to the courts, then seek to exercise their rights. But the courts – it’s expensive, long and boring …
However, according to the same Mrs. Khovanskaya, “the scale of the disaster” is not as great as it sometimes seems: the State’s obligations are not met by the houses, which were built before 1970, and that approximately 5-10% of the housing stock.
Elena Nikolaeva ( “ER”) complained that more than a year, the State Duma can not accept, despite the positive conclusion of the government, the bill, which offers another solution to the problem: declare perpetual free privatization only for certain categories of people such as orphans. Ms. Nikolaeva recalled that “property – not only good, but also the burden»
In the near future, will receive a receipt for payment of property tax, calculated on the cadastral value of the burden of the property will be able to on their skin feel. many Russians, who believed that free privatization – it’s just a gift of the state, for which do not have to pay anything
.
No comments:
Post a Comment